Search for: "Neighbors v. Anderson" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
The Appeals Court explained that Malcolm Moulton challenges the district court's approval of a settlement agreement arising from a class action filed by the neighbors of a steel mill owned by United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:17 am by Patricia Salkin
Anderson v City of Blue Ash, 2014 WL 3102326 (SD OH 7/7/2014)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Discrimination [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:21 pm by Patricia Salkin
As to Plaintiff’s argument that an application would be futile, the conduct of the neighbors and Anderson indicated that they would likely oppose a variance if the Plaintiffs sought one (whether for discriminatory reasons or not), there was no evidence in the record that either the neighbors or Anderson were members of the body authorized to grant a variance, i.e., the Board of Appeals. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:03 am by Patricia Salkin
As to Plaintiff’s argument that an application would be futile, the conduct of the neighbors and Anderson indicated that they would likely oppose a variance if the Plaintiffs sought one (whether for discriminatory reasons or not), there was no evidence in the record that either the neighbors or Anderson were members of the body authorized to grant a variance, i.e., the Board of Appeals. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:57 am
The court begins its opinion by explaining how and why the suit arose:Arthur Firstenberg sued his neighbor, Raphaela Monribot, and Robin Leith, the owner-lessor of Monribot's residence, for injunctive relief and monetary damages under the theories of nuisance and prima facie tort. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm by scottgaille
  The Bakers’ new neighbors were Walker County Sheriff Elkins and his young wife, Sallie. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:52 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  It does come down to protection v. exercise. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]