Search for: "Neighbours v. Neighbours"
Results 1 - 20
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 4:33 am
See Suzuki v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 8:36 am
David ManganThe networked society as a new landscape for obligations The neighbour principle On 26 May 1932, the UK’s House of Lords, released its decision in Donoghue v Stevenson. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:32 am
In Donley Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 11:50 am
Scheuermann) v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:46 am
Read the decision at: Allison v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Neighbouring rights rarely get much judicial review so the case of Re: Sound v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 10:42 am
A surveyor for neighbour D had run a line that purported to represent the boundary with the lands owned by neighbour M, and the trees were being felled by neighbour D on the basis of that survey. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 6:59 am
Read the costs decision at: Hanisch v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 8:44 am
Justice Heeney concluded that the biosolid application did not contaminate the Plaintiff's well.Read the decision at: Marshall v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm
On 12 October 2021, Oxford County Court handed down judgment in Fairhurst v Woodard (Case No: G00MK161). [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:41 am
Justice Gordon awarded Neighbour M a further $30,000 plus HST for the cost of "appropriate restoration", which would involve removing broken tree limbs in the canopy and on the forest floor, removing tree tops from timber removed, removing damaged, leaning and spring pole trees, chipping and spreading chips on the forest floor, and cutting stumps to ground level.Read the decision at: M v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:41 am
Justice Gordon awarded Neighbour M a further $30,000 plus HST for the cost of "appropriate restoration", which would involve removing broken tree limbs in the canopy and on the forest floor, removing tree tops from timber removed, removing damaged, leaning and spring pole trees, chipping and spreading chips on the forest floor, and cutting stumps to ground level.Read the decision at: M v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Read the decision at: Hanisch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 4:40 am
See Corporation of the City of Toronto v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:36 am
An earlier criminal excursion into the same dispute is at R. v. de Vos; R. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm
CN & Anor v Poole Borough Council (2017) EWCA Civ 2185 What, if any, duty is owed by a local authority to children to protect them from abuse and harassment by neighbours? [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
Read the decision at: Evans v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:45 am
Although the barn was vacant, the neighbour was considering returning the barn to livestock use. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:25 am
Neighbours can be great. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
Read the decision at: Gueldner v. [read post]
