Search for: "Neil S. Siegel" Results 61 - 80 of 195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm by Jason Mazzone
Lopez (2015) to revisit the Rehnquist Court’s federalism revolution.The colloquy will continue the conversation about the Rehnquist Court as well as take up federalism developments in the Roberts Court and the possible impact (from a federalism perspective) of a new Court member following the death of Justice Scalia.Besides myself, participants at the colloquy include Ernest Young and Neil Siegel (Duke), Rick Hills (NYU), Jud Campbell (Stanford), and Bill Marshall,… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
At Balkinization, Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel analyze what role, if any, “constitutional conventions” should play in the selection of a successor. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:33 pm by Neil Siegel
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The timing of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is prompting much discussion—for example, here, here, here, and here—about whether there are “constitutional conventions” relevant to efforts to fill his seat—or to oppose filling his seat—before the next presidential election. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Bradley and  Neil Siegel, Duke University School of Law, have posted Historical Gloss, Constitutional Conventions, and the Judicial Separation of Powers: Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discern the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch, and the Supreme Court has recently endorsed the relevance of such practice. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 3:34 am by Amy Howe
”  And Amy Wax and Neil Siegel discuss the case in a podcast for Constitution Daily. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
On Wednesday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg spoke with one of her former clerks, Neil S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:16 am by Curtis Bradley
If functional concerns are stripped out of the political question doctrine in the service of formalism, they may well reemerge at the merits stage, something that Neil Siegel and I suggested in a recent article on Noel Canning in the Supreme Court Review. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am by Steve Lubet
 Professors Reva Siegel and Neil Siegel have described Griswold as “offer[ing] women the most significant constitutional protection since the Nineteenth Amendment gave women the right to vote, constitutional protection as important as the cases prohibiting sex discrimination that the Court would decide in the next decade – perhaps even more so. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:20 am by Barbara Babcock
In addition to Dodson’s own essay, the book includes contributions by, among others, Thomas Goldstein, Lani Guinier, Robert Katzmann, Herma Hill Kay, Linda Kerber, Dahlia Lithwick, Neil and Reva Siegel, Nina Totenberg, and Joan Williams. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am by Bridget Crawford
John's Andreas Delgado ADCasteleiro Durham (UK) Michelle M. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 4:44 am by Bridget Crawford
Clarke donaldcclarke George Washington David Cleveland ProfCleveland Valparaiso Robert Clinton robertclinton Arizona  State David S. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm by James Fox
Connecticut Then and Now, with Cary Franklin, Melissa Murray,  Doug NeJaime,  and Neil Siegel speaking, and Isabel Medina and Reva B. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am by Guest Blogger
”)This reliance on animus in the sexual orientation cases may represent, as Neil Siegel has used the term in other contexts, a “way station” to application of traditional equal protection doctrines (suspect classification analysis and explicit application of heightened scrutiny) to sexual minorities. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 11:41 am by Steven Calabresi
[Earlier contributions to this symposium came from: John Neiman, Dale Carpenter, Robin Wilson, Bill Eskridge,  Scott Michelman, Neil Siegel, and Suzanne Goldberg.] [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
*Neil Siegel analyzes the cert denials as a form of persuading rather than coercing lower courts to strike down same-sex marriage bans, a “passive virtue” (Alexander Bickel’s phrase) that the Court adopts in times of constitutional transition. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm by John Neiman
[Earlier posts in this symposium include contributions from: Dale Carpenter, Robin Wilson, Bill Eskridge,  Scott Michelman, Neil Siegel, and Suzanne Goldberg.] [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm by Dale Carpenter
[Earlier posts in this symposium include contributions from: Robin Wilson, Bill Eskridge,  Scott Michelman, Neil Siegel, and Suzanne Goldberg.] [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
  Also at this blog, Suzanne Goldberg and Neil Siegel weighed in on the denials. [read post]