Search for: "Neil S. Siegel"
Results 101 - 120
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2010, 7:37 pm
Ringhand, Associate Professor of Law, University of Georgia School of Law Neil S. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
I understand Neil Siegel to be making largely a mode 1 argument. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 2:35 pm
Connecticut Then and Now, with Cary Franklin, Melissa Murray, Doug NeJaime, and Neil Siegel speaking, and Isabel Medina and Reva B. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am
Neil S. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 1:03 pm
And in an article on an on-line forum, Neil Siegel wrote “The consequentialist concern that traditionalists will be branded as bigots is sufficiently serious for Justice Alito that it counts as a reason for the Court to reject” constitutional claims. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Thomas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2014, Forthcoming).Vivian Grosswald Curran, Reviving Human Rights Legislation After Kiobel, (American Journal of International Law, Vol. 107, p. 858, 2013).Neil Siegel, Federalism as a Way Station: Windsor as Exemplar of Doctrine in Motion, (February 14, 2014). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:38 am
Saks, Rita Simon, Neil Vidmar, Jeffrey B. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:33 pm
Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel The timing of the death of Justice Antonin Scalia is prompting much discussion—for example, here, here, here, and here—about whether there are “constitutional conventions” relevant to efforts to fill his seat—or to oppose filling his seat—before the next presidential election. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
Speakers will include Matthew Adler, Jack Balkin, Stuart Benjamin, James Boyle, Erwin Chemerinsky, Robert Cooter, Mark Hall, Gillian Metzger, Abigail Moncrieff, Arti Rai, Barak Richman, Theodore Ruger, Stephen Sachs, Neil Siegel, Ilya Somin, Guy-Uriel Charles and Ernest Young. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:05 am
Ruebhausen Fund, the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities-- which will publish scholarly essays from the conference--and by Yale's Information Society Project.The conference website is here, and you can register for the conference here. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
*Neil Siegel analyzes the cert denials as a form of persuading rather than coercing lower courts to strike down same-sex marriage bans, a “passive virtue” (Alexander Bickel’s phrase) that the Court adopts in times of constitutional transition. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:35 am
Neil Siegel and Reva SiegelFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries Roe v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 9:06 am
21 Mar 2012, 6:58 pm
Farmer's Loan and Trust Company in 1895, which struck down the federal income tax. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
”)This reliance on animus in the sexual orientation cases may represent, as Neil Siegel has used the term in other contexts, a “way station” to application of traditional equal protection doctrines (suspect classification analysis and explicit application of heightened scrutiny) to sexual minorities. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:11 pm
Finally, we know that he named three people to act as co-executors for the estate: John Branca, John McClain, and Barry Siegel. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
At Balkinization, Curtis Bradley and Neil Siegel analyze what role, if any, “constitutional conventions” should play in the selection of a successor. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
Simon LazarusEarlier this Spring, on Balkinization, Mark Tushnet and Neil Siegel took issue with Joan Biskupic’s assertion, in her recent biography of Chief Justice John Roberts, The Chief, that Roberts “acted more like a politician” than a judge in his epochal 2012 constitutional rulings on the Affordable Care Act in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
SECOND ADDENDUM: Neil Siegel has something on this as well (referring in his post to a forthcoming Va. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:04 am
In brief, the paper argues that recent efforts to make an historical case for using Resolution VI of the original Virginia Plan as the fundamental principle for construing federal power under Article I, Section 8 are fatally flawed due to both historical omission and historical error.I am pleased to join Neil Siegel as a co-guest blogger on the subject of Resolution VI, and in later posts I plan on responding to Neil’s comments. [read post]
