Search for: "Neil S. v. Mary L." Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: Making Charter School Boards All-Purpose State Actors Under the Supreme Court’s Amtrak Case, (Drake Law Review, Forthcoming).Neil Siegel, The Wages of Crying Roe: Some Realism About Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
In fact, Bruen's focus on text as elucidated by legal history is nothing new in Second Amendment litigation. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Neil Hamilton and Louis Bilionis
See William Sullivan et al, Educating Lawyers: Preparation for the Profession of Law 128-40 (2007);  Neil Hamilton, “Professionalism Clearly Defined,” 18 The Prof Lawyer 4-20 (No. 4, 2008); Neil Hamilton, “Assessing Professionalism: Measuring Progress in the Formation of an Ethical Professional Identity,” 5 U St Thomas L J 470,482-83 (2008); Neil Hamilton, “Fostering Professional Formation (Professionalism): Lessons From Carnegie… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court’s recent decision overturning its 1973 decision Roe v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Justice Neil Gorsuch’s battle against the Chevron doctrine arguably played an important role. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At Slate, Kyla Eastling, Danny Li and Neil Weare regret that the court declined the opportunity to overrule “the Insular Cases, a series of controversial decisions from the era of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
And theatres can have performances of songs from Noël Coward’s London Calling! [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Mary Ziegler explains that June Medical Services v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks at Justice Neil Gorsuch’s new book, “A Republic, If You Can Keep It. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 6:38 am
PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]