Search for: "Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman"
Results 41 - 56
of 56
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2014, 6:52 am
Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman, and Nelson TebbeThe Court has decided the first of two anticipated blockbuster religion clause cases this term. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:04 am
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman On Thursday, Michael McConnell offered his current thoughts on the Hobby Lobbycase. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman, Hobby Lobby and the Establishment Clause, Part III: Reconciling Amos and Cutter Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman, Hobby Lobby and the Establishment Clause: Gedicks and the Government David Gans, Can Corporations Exercise Religion? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm
Richard Schragger, Micah Schwartzman, and Nelson TebbeThe New York Times has an editorialendorsing the position that we and a number of other church-state scholars have taken in an amicus brief recently filed in Sebelius v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger, and Nelson TebbeWe wanted to post a couple updates to the Establishment Clause argument against granting an exemption under RFRA to the so-called “contraception mandate” – which may be a misnomer (as Marty Lederman has argued). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:28 pm
Meanwhile, here at Balkinization, we’ve already published several important posts—this one by Joey Fishkin, and a series of three posts on the Establishment Clause questions raised in the case—here, hereand here—co-authored by Micah Schwartzman, Rich Schragger and Nelson Tebbe. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeWe have been arguing (here, here, and here) that a religious exemption to the contraception mandate would raise serious concerns under the Establishment Clause. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 6:50 am
I'm not offering up all the links here, but those interested in the contraceptive mandate cases should definitely check out: 1) The extensive series of posts Eugene Volokh has put up at the VC this week canvassing most if not all of the issues and angles in the cases. 2) Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman's arguments on Slate and Balkinization that accommodating the claimants here would violate the Establishment Clause. 3) Marc DeGirolami's post on the Center for… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:58 am
I should note that I do not deal in the piece with the argument -- pressed eloquently (natch) in this Slate essay by Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman -- that it would violate the Establishment Clause to accommodate, under RFRA, an employer like Hobby Lobby. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:04 pm
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah SchwartzmanLast week, we argued hereand elsewherethat a basic constitutional issue has been overlooked in the religious freedom challenge to the contraception mandate. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm
” (I quote here a Slate piece by Micah Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe, though the argument was also made in much more detail in this law review article by Fred Gedicks & Rebecca Van Tassell.) [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 8:17 pm
Balkinization: The Establishment Clause and the Contraception Mandate, by Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe: Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Sebelius v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe began an important conversation with their post on this blog about the contraceptive mandate and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:05 am
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeYesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:20 am
Nelson Tebbe is a Professor of Law at Brooklyn Law School. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Both Brian Leiter and Micah Schwartzman have questioned from a philosophical perspective whether the distinctive treatment of religion is capable of coherent justification. [read post]
