Search for: "Nevers v. Callahan*"
Results 1 - 20
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2023, 2:46 pm
See, Hobbs v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 9:10 am
That's a no-brainer.But I've never heard of someone successfully playing that same role after they've lost. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Ellis never raised his Cronic claim in state court, and thus the state courts never adjudicated that claim on the merits. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 2:15 am
Winzer v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:02 pm
Accordingly, the waiver is unenforceable akin to People v Callahan, People v Malloy, People v Folks, People v Dongo, People v Gladden and People v McCaskell. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 10:46 am
Never. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
But under the defense scenario, there could never be a “reliable situation” because you never have a jury trial in juvenile court. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:09 pm
Benson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 4:27 am
Moore v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 10:02 am
In yet another development in the closely watched case of Rizo v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
But to say that the thing's unanimous overlooks key differences between the panel members -- differences that may well suggest that the Supreme Court might well take a different view of the subject.The lead opinion -- for a bare majority of 6 of the 11 judges -- says that an employer can never be considered as a justification for paying women less than men. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 2:45 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that if the plaintiffs are indeed indigent and can't pay the up-front costs, then defendants can either (1) pay those costs for 'em, or (2) waive their right to arbitrate.The only alternative would be to hold that an attorney can protect its own (potential) misconduct by including an expensive arbitration provision that he knew the clients could never employ given its expense. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
It was a dark night in the City that Never Sleeps. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:34 am
US v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:07 am
US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
It gets dismissed because the shareholder never made a demand on the directors, with the court finding that a demand wouldn't have necessarily been futile. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 11:02 am
Which is good advice in any event, but particularly so if you don't want the federal government to have your DNA.P.S. - I've never seen someone's first name differ in the California State Bar records. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:06 pm
Grant v. [read post]
