Search for: "Nevers v. Callahan*"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Toth v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 8:26 am
Honorable Judge Carlos Bea Practice pointer: When an opinion starts by observing that a defendant stands out as a “cara dura,” things probably won’t end well.United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 7:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:46 am
The panel quotes De Canas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:40 am
Safford Unified School District #1 v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 7:44 am
Davis v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:29 am
That case is Miranda v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:31 am
., v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Monday’s ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 8:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 4:43 am
In Kerry v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
The 1988 regulations were never implemented because in 1991 George H.W. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:11 pm
Amicus counsel participated in questioning witnesses and filed a lengthy supplemental brief.The Ninth Circuit then reiterated its prior holding in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 6:55 am
And yet herein lies the dilemma: For if courts never address the constitutional question, the right will never be clearly established and officials will be perpetually immunized for unconstitutional conduct. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 9:59 am
If the courts can answer the "clearly-established" question first, then the law never gets any clearer, and more defendants win.The conclusion in Pearson v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:58 am
(But see Pearson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 8:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
