Search for: "New Hampshire Insurance Co." Results 81 - 100 of 226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2007, 6:54 am
  Enough courts have come to accept coverage for these "negligence" theories that insurers have added new exclusions specifically directed at certain types of offenses that give rise to them, notably assault and battery and sexual molestation.In the latest skirmish over these new wordings, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire (which has been very busy lately on the coverage front) ruled last week in Philbrick v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:55 am by Mike Aylward
Co., 712 F.2d 1498, 1502 (1st Cir. 1983)(applying New Hampshire law to loss arising out of insured facility in New Hampshire even though the policy was issued in New York). [read post]
16 May 2022, 6:57 pm by Jon L. Gelman
The New Hampshire court addressed obstacle preemption briefly, noting that the insurer in that case had made its argument “in a single sentence. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 5:09 am by Ben Vernia
The United States alleged that rather than billing the government for what the insured would have been obligated to pay had the claims been submitted solely to the third party insurer (typically the co-pay), CVS billed and was paid a higher amount by Medicaid. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 5:00 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Says that New Jersey is working with New Hampshire now to deal with this problem. [read post]
26 May 2023, 12:08 pm by Liberty Ritchie
Life Insurance Co.13‐0207‐EXM In Re: Target Market Conduct Examination of Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Co.13‐0208‐EXM In Re: Target Market Conduct Examination of Great American Life Insurance Co.13‐0209‐EXM In Re: Target Market Conduct Examination of Illinois Mutual Life Insurance Co.13‐0210‐EXM In Re: Target Market Conduct Examination of ING USA Annuity… [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 5:23 pm
As stated by the Supreme Court of New Hampshire when interpreting a policy excluding water loss, "[t]o apply the ensuing loss provision to provide coverage for what is essentially a flood would subvert the intent of the parties" (Bates v Phenix Mut. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
The New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) reported that a recent survey of immigrants on occupational health and work safety showed that most of them never heard of workers' compensation. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:59 am by Dan Hargrove
  The United States alleged that rather than billing the government for what the insured would have been obligated to pay had the claims been submitted solely to the third party insurer (typically the co-pay), CVS billed and was paid a higher amount by Medicaid. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 4:03 am by Mike Aylward
Co., 98 N.Y.2d 208, 774 N.E.2d 687 (2002) In a landmark victory for insurers, the New York Court of Appeals declared that a trial court did not err in adopting a "time on the risk" approach to long-tail pollution cleanup claims. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Bradlees of New England, Inc., 250 F.3d 10 (1st Cir. 2001) (applying New Hampshire law); Christopher v. [read post]