Search for: "New Hampshire v. Cooper" Results 1 - 20 of 96
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm by Bill Marler
Confirmation through laboratory testing of the jerky is pending at the New Hampshire Public Health Labs. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:29 am by Doug Kendall
 First of all, among the photo ID laws passed by covered jurisdictions since 2006, more have been cleared (New Hampshire, Georgia and Michigan) than not (Texas and South Carolina, the latter blocked for the 2012 election only).Second, as a legal matter, amici’s argument relies on a misinterpretation of this Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  In New Hampshire’s Republican Legislature, GOP lawmakers with no desire to restrict campaign financing are nonetheless pushing forward an anti-Citizens United Article V application. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (Southern University Law Review, Forthcoming).Preston Green, Julie Mead & Suzanne Eckes, Covenants to Discriminate: How the Anti-LGBT Policies of Participating Voucher Schools Might Violate the State Action Doctrine, (University of New Hampshire Law Review, Forthcoming).Enyinna S. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 6:43 am by Marissa Miller
New Hampshire, in which the Court is considering eyewitness identifications made under “suggestive circumstances. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 3:10 pm by José Guillermo
v=G3WP58NDSy8Por terminar la década de los cuarenta, el comportamiento del ser humano para la maldad, la ambición, la angurria, el deseo de progresar sin importar el daño a otro u otros, no ha variado respecto de nuestro siglo y la modernidad brindada por la velocidad en la información, mas, en aquellos años TODAVÍA  se valoraba la honestidad, pecado INTOLERABLE para los angurrientos de nuestra era y de aquella también, el Director… [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm by Kent Scheidegger
New Hampshire, No. 10-8974, on the extent to which allegedly unreliable identifications raise a federal constitutional question.Gonzalez v. [read post]