Search for: "New Hampshire v. Hernandez" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2007, 3:21 pm
New Hampshire Public Utilities et al (USDC NH 05-00094 Barbadoro, USDJ) 06-2179, Yu v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jacob Pagano
Hernandez contested the immigration judge’s burden allocation and prevailed: the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted her petition for a writ of habeas corpus and ordered the judge to provide a bond hearing where the government, not Hernandez, bore the burden to prove danger or flight risk by clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:26 pm
“Marriage Equality,” as the New York statute is entitled, has been a hard fought battle.New York’s highest court held that there was no state constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Hernandez v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Lyle Denniston
The case sent to the Justice Department for reaction, Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
A note on methodology: I searched the LexisNexis news database and Google for foreign and domestic instances of sextortion that were recorded online in the period since the Brookings report was published. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
New Hampshire, 10-8527, apparently for Perry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  A non obstante provision thus was a useful way for legislatures to specify that they did not want courts distorting the new law to accommodate the old.Mensing, 131 S. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Before explaining the court's analysis, I can't refrain - as a New Yorker - from pointing out that this beautifully and clearly written opinion by Justice Mark Cady stands as a strong rebuke to the bizarre plurality opinion produced by Judge Robert Smith of the New York Court of Appeals in the 2006 ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
The United States Bankruptcy Court in New Hampshire has interpreted the phrase “adjustments as equities may require,” as a tool for courts to prevent windfall profits for a creditor. [read post]