Search for: "New Hampshire v. Maine"
Results 221 - 240
of 415
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
Courts in New Hampshire, Maine and California have ruled similarly. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:31 am
Main reason for judgment: economic point of view—sale of computer program on CD v. by download is similar. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
Minnesota Passed the House and passed Committee in the Senate Missouri Passed the House Montana Law (2013) New Hampshire Passed the House Ohio Passed the House South Carolina Passed committee Also requires a warrant for electronic device searches. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Kennedy III, Barbara Lee, Zoe Lofgren, Betty McCollum, Ed Perlmutter, Mark Pocan, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Janice Shakowsky, Terri Sewell, Carol Shea-Porter, and Chris Van Hollen A group of State Attorneys General from Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania,… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
More recently Bloomberg Law stepped into the main ring. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 2:52 am
Indeed, Massachusetts was separated by New Hampshire from its northern provinces until the creation of the State of Main in 1820. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Dorpan, S.L. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Dorpan, S.L. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
Dorpan, S.L. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
— that permit such marriages: Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:23 am
Currently 13 states recognize same-sex marriage: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and also the District of Columbia. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:30 pm
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve long been curious about the “duty to comply with negative demands,” an analog to the duty to retreat suggested by the Model Penal Code (based on the Restatement (First) of Torts) and implemented in Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Maine, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and New Jersey. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:21 pm
[1] California, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Vermont, and Washington have already legalized same-sex marriage. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 6:01 am
This has been federal law in the Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Puerto Rico and Rhode Island) and the 8th Circuit (Nebraska, Iowa, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Missouri and Arkansas). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:01 pm
New Hampshire v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm
Thirteen states (California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington) and the District of Columbia currently recognize or will soon recognize same-sex marriages. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 10:16 am
Justice Alito, writing for the majority, honed in on the main point Mutual Pharmaceutical’s counsel Jay Lefkowitz emphasized at argument – that the New Hampshire tort depends on a finding that the product is “unreasonably” dangerous. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 8:52 am
Windsor, thirteen states (California, Connecticut, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington as well as the District of Columbia) had legalized same sex marriages. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
Those include California (post-Perry), Connecticut, District of Columbia, Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. [read post]
