Search for: "New York Central R. Co. v. New York" Results 41 - 60 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2010, 9:22 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
We previously wrote here about the Delaware Supreme Court asking New York's highest court for a ruling on the controlling New York law regarding the central issue of in pari delicto. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:44 am by Peter Mahler
Finally, those dealing with New York LLC agreements ought not to be overly concerned about Huatuco being followed by a New York court. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
  She was covered under her parents' policy with New York Central Mutual, which included a UM/SUM endorsement. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run September 20, 2009. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am by Peter Mahler
In Manhattan and other parts of New York City there are many small co-op properties, including converted walk-up tenements and industrial loft buildings, with as few as four, five or six units where each tenant-shareholder may have a seat on the co-op’s board of directors and material voting power, thereby melding into one the theoretically distinct realms of director and shareholder authority and likewise conflating common and individual concerns. [read post]
27 May 2014, 5:54 pm
Glenn Greenwald has a new book out about Edward Snowden, and Michael Kinsley has a review of it in the New York Times. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:56 am
Insurance to defend and indemnify offices and employees of a political subdivision of the StateWatkins Glen Central School District v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:04 am
Plaintiff failed to offer sufficient evidence under New York law of exposure level. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am by Roshonda Scipio
; New York, N.Y. : Cambridge University Press, 2010. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm by Jay L. Himes and Amy Garzon
Himes, who also co-chairs the firm’s Antitrust Practice Group, is the former Antitrust Bureau Chief, Office of the Attorney General of New York. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:55 pm
” The Appellate Division ruled that the individual was entitled to such a hearing [Murphy v City of New York, 35 AD3d 319].Further, on the issue of “public disclosure,” courts have ruled that the internal disclosure of allegedly stigmatizing reasons for the discharge or demotion of an employee to agency administrators “having a right to know” does not constitute a public disclosure of such information and thus a name-clearing hearing" was… [read post]