Search for: "New York Central R. Co. v. New York" Results 141 - 160 of 484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Ben dismissed the intellectual reasoning behind a New York Times editorial that called for the closure of the detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Matthew DeVries
Tully Construction Co., 139 A.D.3d 930 (May 18, 2016), the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, reversed a trial court’s award of delay damages in favor of a subcontractor on a public contract. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The case  of Verein für Konsumenteninformation  v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 8:42 am by Barry Barnett
In August 2011, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized all of the lawsuits in the Southern District of New York, before U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 10:11 am by Eric Caligiuri
New York Telephone Co., relied upon by the government, does not apply. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Next week, the 110th AALS Annual Meeting starts in New York. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:39 am by Amy Zegart
Horrock, “Intelligence Investigations End Though Gaps Remain,” New York Times, December 14, 1975. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
In many of those states, including New York, courts define oppression as conduct that defeats the minority shareholder’s “reasonable expectations. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
" In anticipation of this weekend’s talks in Vienna, the New York Times writes that “one of the main points of contention will be to determine whom to include among opposition groups in future negotiations. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:35 am by David DePaolo
There are state supreme courts reviewing the fairness equation right now, but the standard for review will be the standard espoused by the US Supreme Court in 1917 when America's highest court held compulsory work comp was constitutional.So long as comp provided a "reasonably just substitute" to a tort claim, the US Supreme Court ruled in New York Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]