Search for: "New York Central R. Co. v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:21 pm
A central goal of Sarbanes-Oxley is the accurate valuation and protection of a company’s assets. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
The change was sparked by a decision by a federal judge in New York who ruled that the key verse in the song was not protected under copyright for lack of originality. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16 in the District of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:50 am
A discussion of the history of corporate criminal liability would be too detailed for this post, but in its most simplistic form, ever since the 1909 case of New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
How the volitional conduct test operates in the cloud is demonstrated in the Hotfile case, where the district court stated: Thus, the law is clear that Hotfile and [the owner] are not liable for direct copyright infringement because they own and manage internet facilities that allow others to upload and download copyrighted material. . . . [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
It is, therefore, relevant to note that so much was the value attached to the precedent of the highest court that in The London Street Tramways Co. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
Substantive versus Procedural Theories of Private Judging Christopher R. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
The Court stated that “[r]ecognition of disparate-impact claims is consistent with the FHA’s central purpose. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
The citation read: “See generally R. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
– EPA News Release, August 11, 2010 International Minerals Technology, LLC, of The Woodlands, Texas, has agreed to pay a $30,000 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the federal Clean Water Act at its Tetra Micronutrients production facility in Fairbury, Neb. [read post]
