Search for: "New York Central Securities Corp. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
” In their decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
New York State Liquor Authority, 134 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 1998); Flying Dog Brewery, LLLP v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Abbasi and Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
Wednesday, Dec. 19 at 9:00 a.m.: The German Marshall Fund of the United States will host a panel discussion on Ukraine’s upcoming presidential elections. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am by Anushka Limaye
.: The American Enterprise Institute will host a discussion on the state of freedom of speech in South Korea, and the implications of new media regulations on the country. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am by Anushka Limaye
Thursday, Dec. 6 at 9:30 a.m.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am by Anushka Limaye
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:00 am by Harry Graver, Scott R. Anderson
First, there was no general personal jurisdiction because neither organization had the sorts of ties to New York that would qualify them as “essentially at home” there, as required by the Supreme Court’s 2014 holding in Daimler Ag v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden responds that compelling arbitration here would create an inherent conflict with the purposes and policies of the Bankruptcy Code, and for those reasons, the Court should not compel arbitration, and Firstmark's motion should be denied.JurisdictionThis Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to Judiciary Code Sections 157(b)(1) and 1334(b), and the Standing Order of Reference dated August 28, 1986, as amended by the Order dated December 5, 2012, of the United… [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” In a brief per curiam decision, the justices also dismissed United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
  SHARON EUL et al., on behalf of themselves and a class, Plaintiffs,v.TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS et al., Defendants.No. 15 C 7755.United States District Court, N.D. [read post]