Search for: "New York News, Inc. v. State of NY"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Underwood, Attorney General, New York, NY (Anisha S. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am
New York Co. 2022) and Scher v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
DEFENDANTS HADN’T COMMITTED A TORTIOUS ACT “WITHIN THE STATE”Because the defendants’ fire doors exposed the decedent to asbestos, a personal-injury case was filed in the New York County Supreme Court.When the defendants’ motion to have the case dismissed for “lack of jurisdiction” was denied, an appeal ensued.And on its review of the record, the Appellate Division, First Department, thought the court below had committed reversible… [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 1:03 pm
A new decision by the New York County Supreme Court called Global Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 3:22 pm
It is well settled in New York that a party may not bring a class action lawsuit in State Court for a violation of a New York statute if the statute authorizes the prevailing party to collect a penalty. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:00 pm
Supply, Inc. v American Tr. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Evergreen Association, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:06 am
Jurisdiction has the authority to set licensing requirements as part of the qualification for appointment to a positionNew York State Socy. of Professional Engrs., Inc. v City of New York, 2010 NY Slip Op 08352, Decided on November 16, 2010, Appellate Division, First DepartmentPrior to September 3, 2008, the New York City Charter required that the Commissioner of Buildings had to be a licensed professional engineer or… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
Matter of Puig v New York State Police 2023 NY Slip Op 00258 Decided on January 19, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:04 am
in PETER MCCLUSKEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, -v.- NEW YORK STATE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, CHIEF JUDGE JONATHAN LIPPMAN, GABOR & GABOR, DAVID GABOR, HOPE GABOR, Defendants-Appellees we see a pro-se litigant's swipe at the NYS Court system, and his former attorneys. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:21 pm
New York Health Care, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 6421 (N.Y. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
Dudelson, Brooklyn, For Appellant Lambda Legal Defense And Education Fund, Inc., New York (Susan L. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Matter of Verizon NY, Inc. v Mills, 2007 NY Slip Op 52616(U), Decided on August 10, 2007, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Judge Robert M. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 2:43 pm
Hope v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston… [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
The interests of the Governor and Lieutenant Governor could be inequitably affected if we declare that the concurrent resolution is void and enjoin defendant from paying their salaries at the rates set in that resolution (see Matter of Jim Ludtka Sporting Goods, Inc. v City of Buffalo School Dist., 48 AD3d 1103, 1104 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 704 [2008]; Matter of Romeo v New York State Dept. of Educ., 41 AD3d 1102, 1104 [2007]; Matter of Boston… [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 1:28 pm
The First Department today ruled that former New York Knicks basketball player Latrell Sprewell's defamation action against Marc Berman and the New York Post should be dismissed (Sprewell v NYP Holdings, Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 05369). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm
& Constr., Inc., 763 NYS2d 114 [NY App. [read post]
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
The injunction prohibits defendants from continuing to collect co-payments and does not mandate specific conduct by them (State of New York v Town of Haverstraw, 219 AD2d 64, 65-66 [2d Dept 1996]; see generally Second on Second CafÉ, Inc. v Hing Sing Trading, Inc., 66 AD3d 255, 264 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
