Search for: "New York v. Belton"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2012, 3:57 am
New York, which was the law at the time, but a few months after Davis’ conviction the Supreme Court reversed Belton in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
In New York v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:21 am
In New York v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:42 am
Gant clashed with long-standing precedent in 1981’s New York v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:37 pm
S781a) situation where he was stopped, secured, and his car was later searched under Belton (New York v., 453 US 454 (1981)) precedent. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:22 am
In New York v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:29 am
In a suppression motion, Davis acknowledged that the search of the vehicle complied with existing Eleventh Circuit precedent interpreting New York v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
In 2007 relying upon Eleventh Circuit interpretation of Belton v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:52 am
The Long Court set the parameters for a protective search in part by copying the search-incident-to-arrest standard in New York v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:36 am
US, police had searched Davis’ car after his arrest, and the search was upheld in reliance on the Court’s 1981 decision in New York v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
In refusing to block the evidence, the trial judge relied upon the Supreme Court’s 1981 decision in New York v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 1:30 am
Belton. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:26 am
In that case, they overruled New York v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
” In fact, when the Court overruled New York v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
Smith (Ohio 2009) 920 N.E.2d 949, 954, quoting New York v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:11 am
See New York v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Gant the Supreme Court clarified New York v.Belton. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
New York, but not under Arizona v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 5:00 am
The court rejected his motion, citing New York. v. [read post]
