Search for: "New York v. Belton"
Results 61 - 80
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 5:41 am
[The court notes Gant "calls into question the continued viability of New York v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:07 am
There, Justice Scalia again wrote the majority opinion, receding from the holding in New York v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:57 am
”The ruling directly limits New York v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:38 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently overruled a long established precedent, found in New York v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:07 pm
Perhaps the most important criminal law decision issued so far this year, was that of the United States Supreme Court in Arizona v Gant, â€â [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:45 am
Twelve years later, the Court was confronted with the question of how that applied to the arrest of an occupant of an automobile, and held in New York v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
In applying this rule to the automobile context, the Supreme Court had previously held in New York v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:11 pm
Gant in the blogs: New York Law Blog: After Gant, Is New York’s Car Search Rule Stricter, More Lenient or Juuuust Right? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
" Twelve years later, in New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
If last week's Gant opinion -- which substantially rolled back the damage inflicted by New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:18 am
The trial court upheld the search, since the Supreme Court decided in New York v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:59 am
On 21 Apr 09, the Supreme Court addressed the troubling problem of searches of automobiles under the New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:45 pm
The decision changes a rule that law enforcement has relied on for nearly 30 years and which the justices noted was a misreading of the court's prior decision in 1981 (New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:25 am
So the search was unreasnable.The Gant decision dramatically changes the New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
The state court held that Gant could not have reached his car during the search and posed no safety threat to the officers, making a vehicle search unreasonable under the “reaching-distance rule” of New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:12 pm
California and applied to car stops by New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:28 pm
I had always thought that the Supreme Court’s ruling in New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 2:28 pm
New York, but said it has been misapplied by courts. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 2:03 pm
For almost thirty years, beginning with the United States Supreme Court decision in New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:59 pm
Although we have recognized that a motorist’s privacy interest in his vehicle is less substantial than in his home, see New York v. [read post]
