Search for: "New York v. Class"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2009, 9:13 pm
Class Action Counsel Obtained Significant Benefit through Class Action Settlement Following 10-Year Litigation but Requested Multiplier was Excessive given Billing Rates of Class Counsel, Warranting Multiplier of 1.5 rather than 1.79 as Requested New York Federal Court Holds Plaintiff filed a class action in New York state court against his automobile insurance company following its payment of insurance benefits that allegedly… [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:50 am
They claim defendants did not pay hourly employees an extra hour of pay when working a ten-hour day, as required under New York law. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
In the Products Liability section of January’s issue of the New York Law Journal, Michael Hoenig reviews two interesting new opinions. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 10:15 am
Midland Funding, LLC. have filed a joint motion with the New York federal district court seeking preliminary approval of a class settlement. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 5:26 am
Board of Trustees of State University of New York, 42 F.3d 135, 140 (2d Cir.1994)). [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Silberblatt v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:41 am
Gallego v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed a significant victory to New York’s home care industry.1 In Abdullayeva v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 2:31 pm
Plaintiff’s lawyer filed the class action in the Southern District of New York on the grounds of diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:30 am
Ventimiglia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
The New York Court of Appeals affirmed. [read post]
26 May 2009, 12:05 am
In People v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
" Other press coverage appears in the New York Times ("Appeals Court Panel Throws Out Class Action Over Light Cigarettes") and the New York Sun ("Judge Stamps Out a Cigarette Class Action"). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:21 pm
Ct., March 31, 2010) in which the Court held that a New York state rule prohibiting class actions to recover statutory penalties did not apply in a case filed in federal court exercising diversity jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:21 am
In an opinion piece in the New York Times, it's argued that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) gets second-class treatment. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Steinberg v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 5:09 am
Entity that Employed Significant Number of Putative Class Members was an Indispensable Party under Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and could not be Joined in Class Action Without Destroying Federal Court Diversity Jurisdiction thus Necessitating Dismissal of Class Action Complaint New York Court Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against Clear Channel Communications and Clear Channel Broadcasting for violations of… [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
—another employment class action from the Northern District of New York. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
Since the decision was issued in June, cases have been filed in New York federal courts against Conde Nast, Warner Music, Gawker Media and others. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 1:40 pm
Professor Samuel Issacharoff, of New York University Law School, was one of the... [read post]
