Search for: "Newman v. Holder"
Results 61 - 80
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:11 am
Bitmanagement Software GmbH v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
One of the Flashpoint manuals is marked "an unpublished work and is considered a trade secret belonging to the copyright holder. [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
But I digress…(4) Newman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am
In another First Department decision earlier this month, the court in Newman v Newman affirmed a decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 11:03 am
World Family Corporation v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
Judge Newman wrote the opinion for the court, which was joined by Chief Judge Rader. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
Judge Newman wrote the opinion for the court, which was joined by Chief Judge Rader. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
In effect, the patent holder has to persist in enforcement despite prevailing with an injunction in place. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
This is something to be scraped off the judicial shoe as too close-minded, just as Judge Newman opined in dissent. [read post]
22 May 2018, 7:18 am
You can read a lot of this history in Morton Int’l v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
The rule is really quite simple: If the copyright holder agrees to transfer ownership to another party, that party must get the copyright holder to sign a piece of paper saying so. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
Hologic v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 6:30 pm
Supply v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Tokai v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 11:30 pm
She was an employee of Haringey but was also an office holder – appointed to the role of Director of Children’s Services by the Secretary of State. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
For example, in Dana v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
