Search for: "Next Level Residential Services, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 9:40 am
Across the country, service oriented amenities such as housekeeping, valet dry [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:09 pm
(This rate only applies to C-Corporations, not S-Corps, LLCs, or partnerships.) [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On 3 February 2023, judgment was handed down in the Supreme Court of South Australia in Duffy v Google LLC [2023] SASC 13. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:27 am
When a tech company moves to your city, the effects ripple far beyond just the people it employs. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 5:00 pm
First time offenders who commit misdemeanors and low-level felonies are typically eligible to apply for the Accelerated Rehabilitation First Time Offenders Program. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 3:27 pm
For example, in uncodified language, the bill provides, in fiscal 2024 through 2026, the (next) Governor is to include in the annual budget bill an appropriation of $5 Million to provide grants under a new program, the purpose of which is to reduce GHG emissions from multifamily residential buildings (.. but $5 Million could be the cost of retrofitting one existing large multifamily building). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
This period of high inflation will ripple into the next election cycle, too. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:20 am
Jake’s Law: The Balance of Safety and Privacy In 2014, lawmakers introduced a new law called “Jake’s Law” to enforce stricter punishments for distracted drivers to help prevent casual recklessness in Maryland. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
City of Newark et al., (SI XVII, LLC, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (2022) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) applied to the City of Tustin (the “City”) for a conditional use permit and design review approval to build a new 32-pump gas station project next to an existing Costco warehouse. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Proof of service outside the state shall be by affidavit of the individual who made the service. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
Island Industrial, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Approval by CPUC would result in a rate increase for residential customers of roughly 4.6% and Direct Access or CCAs at a rate of 5.7% respectively. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:28 am
Estates, LLC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Initially, the City told IDEA that the project did not comply with the minimum density under the General Plan (requiring at least 16 residential units), but in late 2015 City staff informed IDEA that the project could be approved with only 7 units due to the site’s environmental constraints. [read post]
