Search for: "Nexus Property Management"
Results 21 - 40
of 350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 9:26 am
Johns River Water Management Dist v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
Shelley Ross Saxer Land-use regulation allows the government to condition approval of a land-use permit on the landowner’s surrender of a property interest (exaction) so long as there is an “essential nexus” and “rough proportionality” between the condition demanded and the anticipated impact of the proposed land use. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
Johns River Water Management District, that a property owner who is denied a land use permit on the ground that he refused to pay money to compensate for the harm to be caused by his proposed property use states a claim for a regulatory taking, unless the regulator can establish a “nexus” and “rough proportionality” between the exaction and the alleged harm requiring mitigation. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:40 pm
The court noted that “although differently situated, plaintiffs in the Underlying Claims appear to be various players affected by the alleged scheme – property owners in MPCs, an owner and manager of an MPC, an MPC developer, and a hedge fund that owned MPC debt. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
Johns River Water Management District, the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
Johns River Water Management District (June 25, 2013) has broadened a property owner’s right to bring Constitutional challenges to common conditions found in land-use and development permits. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
Johns River Water Management District (June 25, 2013) has broadened a property owner’s right to bring Constitutional challenges to common conditions found in land-use and development permits. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:46 am
Federal protection still applies under P.L. 86-272, but remember this is limited to net-income based taxes and sales of tangible personal property (i.e., not services). [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Johns River Water Management District, No. 11-1447 (Fla S. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:42 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Alito, reversed on all counts, holding: Permit approvals and denials are both subject to the same the “rational nexus” and “rough proportionality” requirements of the Nollan-Dolan test; Monetary exactions are subject to the same Nollan-Dolan test as property exactions. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:30 pm
Johns River Water Management Dist v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 8:26 am
Hobgood's speech is a far cry from a consumer complaint aimed at receiving a refund or a club manager's public identification of members who are delinquent on paying their dues. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:51 am
The traditional legal and accounting tick-boxes commonly ignore the valuation of intellectual property and are a relic of an industrial age that is not fit for an era dominated by intellectual property. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:51 am
The traditional legal and accounting tick-boxes commonly ignore the valuation of intellectual property and are a relic of an industrial age that is not fit for an era dominated by intellectual property. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm
Johns River Management District In 2013, the Supreme Court enhanced property rights in the United States when it decided Koontz. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 7:36 am
Rather than focusing on managed care, it emphasizes, and includes more material on, health insurance reform. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
Johns River Management District. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
This test is referred to as the "essential nexus" test. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm
It also denied that the person who the tenant spoke with was the property manager. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 8:00 pm
It also denied that the person who the tenant spoke with was the property manager. [read post]
