Search for: "Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz"
Results 41 - 60
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 11:47 am
Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, who is a Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:37 am
In the future, I may blog more often about the activities of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE): The mission of FIRE is to defend and sustain individual rights at America’s colleges and universities. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:12 pm
"National Constitution Center announces major new initiative": Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz has this post today at "The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:20 am
The National Constitution Center has just announced a new three-year initiative, sponsored by a $5.5 million grant from the Templeton Foundation, to do educational outreach, to host constitutional debates across the country, and to develop a new constitutional website, with clause-by-clause bipartisan commentary by leading scholars. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:18 pm
Last week, the Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings on the nomination of Loretta Lynch to be the next Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:04 pm
Louis, MO The Reverend Doctor Clarence Newsome Cincinnati, OH Professor Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz Professor of Law Georgetown Law School Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies Cato Institute New York, NY Professor Jonathan Turley J.B. and Maurice C. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
6 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
On March 3, at 10 a.m., the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:15 am
My friend and college classmate Susan Dominus has an extremely good piece in The New York Times Magazine this week. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:52 pm
" The National Constitution Center has posted on YouTube at this link the video of yesterday's discussion between law professors Erwin Chemerinsky and Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:11 pm
” [Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Cato Supreme Court Review (PDF), earlier on Bond v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:57 am
As a followup to my prior post on David Hyman's argument for intellectual diversity, consider that made by Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz: Elite law faculties are overwhelmingly liberal. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Intelligence Squared presented an excellent debate last week at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia — “Resolved: Mass collection of U.S. phone records violates the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 12:54 pm
I’ve been meaning to announce the new Cato Supreme Court Review, an excellent and thoughtful volume about last Term at the Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 7:41 am
On Tuesday, at 5 p.m., the Heritage Foundation will host an event exploring whether President Obama is fulfilling his constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 5:22 am
Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz on the significance of the IRS having targeted for unfavorable scrutiny “organizations involved in….educating on the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 12:06 am
The Volokh Conspiracy: Targeting the Constitution, by Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz (Georgetown): It is now well known that the IRS targeted tea party organizations. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:35 am
U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 2:36 pm
On Wednesday, Sept. 17, the Cato Institute will host a symposium to celebrate Constitution Day. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 12:40 pm
Linda Greenhouse writes of the Supreme Court’s Noel Canning decision (“Tragedy or Triumph,” New York Times, Sept. 3): “Only an inside-the-Beltway commentariat, infected by a toxic politic atmosphere that obliterates all nuance, could have construed the decision as a defeat — thus enabling the Republicans’ effort to sweep the decision up into their false ‘presidential power grab’ narrative. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 10:27 pm
Bryan Garner is probably the foremost authority on American English usage and certainly the foremost authority on legal usage. [read post]
