Search for: "Nicholl Claimants"
Results 21 - 40
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2010, 10:14 pm
In today’s case (Nicholls v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 11:57 pm
The locus classicus on this area is the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd, where he draws a distinction between two types of alternative remedies- inconsistent and cumulative. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
The first claimant’s email referred not to contracts in general but to a particular contract, that between the claimants and the second defendant. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:47 pm
Nichols, 2009 Ala. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The claimant’s claim was upheld by the Employment Tribunal, who cited in their judgment a number of procedural errors that amounted to a breach of the claimant’s employment contract. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 11:54 am
Nichols, M.D., Oklahoma Supreme Court, No. 102472 (Decided Dec. 19, 2006) -- which is not quite final and official as of this writing -- is accessible through the Court's website, here. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
The first strand Mr Sterling emphasised the importance of the headline, in particular Lord Nicholls’ observation that “Those who print defamatory headlines are playing with fire” (Charleston v News Group Newspapers Limited [1995] 2 AC 65, 74). [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:22 am
” On this basis, and for various other reasons, the Court of Appeal concluded that the Claimant was not “likely” to obtain a final injunction at trial in accordance with the test set out in section 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (“HRA”) and the judgment of Lord Nicholls in Cream Holdings v Banerjee ([2005] 1 AC 253), and therefore lifted the injunction that it had previously granted. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
’ ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 206 per Lord Nicholls). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:01 pm
He referred to the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tse Wai Chun Paul v Albert Cheng [2001] E.M.L.R. 31. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 8:18 am
This is viewed by experts in international law as being a pro-claimant approach. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 3:25 pm
The decision is the latest in a multi-year dispute as to who is the president of the South American country—Nicholás Maduro or Juan Guaidó. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am
Tugendhat J therefore declared that the matter at hand “is a serious issue to be tried in each of the Claimants’ claims for misuse of private information”. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm
Court of Appeal The Claimant appealed this judgment. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 5:24 am
Tragically, each claimant acquired this fatal disease from wrongful exposure to asbestos dust in the course of his employment. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
The CA agreed with the claimants. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
Unjust enrichment is (i) the receipt of a benefit that causes loss to the claimant, or (ii) the wrongful receipt of a benefit by the defendant, or (iii) the receipt of a benefit that “belongs” to the claimant (Paras 152, 154, 161) 154. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 4:46 pm
The claimants – four companies and one individual involved in the running amusement parks – had sought to prevent Mr Cave from sending mass emails and setting up websites in which he campaigned about the issue of safety in theme parks and criticised the claimants and some others. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
Payments to large loss claimants show the same type of spike immediately after the state pressured BP regarding those claims. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
As the claimant was a company the money involved in the action was unlikely to exceed a low sum. [read post]
