Search for: "Nichols v. Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 3:21 am
Nichols, the Superintendent of Hale Creek Correctional Facility in Fulton County, was injured while coaching an employee volleyball team preparing to compete in the "Department of Correction Olympics. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Absolutely correct. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Hinnant, and Michael Nichols [hereinafter collectively referred to as Bey] are former tenured New York City Correction Department officers.Identifying themselves as "Black and of Moorish national origin,” and believing that they were exempt from federal and state taxes, they filed Federal and New York State tax forms claiming exemptions from income tax withholdings. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
Nicholl's petition to the Court, styled Nicholl v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am
But the court is not required to assess whether the Claimant’s understanding of Islam is correct or well founded’ (para 135). [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The Court of Appeal held this to be a correct state of the law and their Lordships agree. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 5:24 am
But it was Parliament that stepped in to correct matters after Barker. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:36 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Finding no constitutional violations that would vitiate Nichols's conviction, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 08a0027p.06 Curry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Applying this analysis, the Judge’s rulings on qualified privilege were correct. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 9:09 pm
Nichols v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court, January 07, 2008 Arave v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:07 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:21 am
The appeals court ruling begins with a lengthy recitation of the allegedly ignored warnings and failures to follow sheriff's department policy directives that occurred prior to and during Nichols' escape, as relayed in the plaintiffs' pleadings. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]