Search for: "Nichols v. City of Taft" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2007, 7:00 pm
In Nichols v City of Taft, the Fifth District Court of Appeal holds that the use of a fee multiplier to compensate for the higher hourly rates of out-of-town counsel requires a sufficient showing -- which the Nichols failed to make -- that hiring local counsel was "impracticable. [read post]