Search for: "Nichols v. Drew"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2009, 1:50 am
Karns of Brown, Drew & Massey, LLP, Casper, Wyoming.Representing Appellee Nicholls, LLC: Frank R. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:12 pm
Here’s the issue that drew my attention to the “rummy name” case, People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:07 am
In James Nichols v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:20 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd., [2001] 1 All E.R. 700 (H.L.), at p. 706, per Lord Hoffmann; see also Nichols v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
News: Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications, Final Submissions in Federal Treasurer’s defamation trial
18 Mar 2015, 1:31 am
“Every one of the imputations is conveyed by Nicholls and Kenny. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:52 pm
The High Court’s recent decision in Allenger v Pelletier [2020] SGHC 279, issued barely a year after the Court of Appeal’s decision in Bi Xiaoqiong v China Medical Technologies [2019] 2 SLR 595; [2019] SGCA 50 (see previous post here) qualifies the latter, confounding Singapore’s position on this complex issue even further. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:52 pm
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Heritage Music Foundation (TTABlog) Precedential no. 4: TTAB finds that “NKJV” has acquired distinctiveness for bibles: In re Thomas Nelson, Inc (TTABlog) Precedential no. 3: Finding KUBA KUBA primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive for cigars, TTAB affirms 2(e)(3) refusal: In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. d/b/a Drew Estate (TTABlog) Precedential no. 2: TTAB cancels supplemental registration for shape of culvert unit due to functionality: Kistner Concrete Products,… [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
The judge, Tugendhat J, drew a distinction between communication to “customer-facing staff” in specific departments (protected by privilege) and wider publication (not protected): [38]. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
This can be a heavy burden, particularly where the charge is a grave one, but requiring defendants to prove truth is not incompatible with Article 10: see McVicar v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 22; Steel v UK [2005] EMLR 314. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Nichols said that “while the automobile has grown cleaner and more efficient, the other half of our transportation system has barely moved the needle on clean air. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Nichols v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
While not directly comparable, this is similar to the position affirmed by the Court in Gillette v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:17 am
In the aftermath of the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm
Most notably, Nichols claims that “postal subsidies… helped to foster the abolitionist press,” and claims that this proves that “we can have a dissident, challenging—anti-government press, operating within a system of subsidies. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The full-court press drew on the GOP’s protest that Silicon Valley is biased against conservatives, a claim disputed by the companies. [read post]
