Search for: "Nichols v. English"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2023, 9:03 pm
Nichols that public school districts receiving federal funds must provide supplemental language instruction to non-English-speaking students. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 11:45 am
Supreme Court held in Lau v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am
Tugendhat J was tasked with answering whether Google Inc can be the subject of litigation in English courts. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:11 am
Nicholl's petition to the Court, styled Nicholl v. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
Nichols, 938 F.Supp. 737, 739 (D.Kan.1996) (applying 15% reduction to the fee award because of respondent's financial status); Salinier v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Nichols does not say. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
While Aerotel placed a large wedge between the EPO Board of Appeals and English courts, recent cases have been bridging the gap, particularly in the area of obviousness in non-software cases (namely, Conor v Angiotech and Actavis v Merck). [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am
As far as we are aware, this is the first example of a purely “private” intervention in a private law case in the English courts. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:58 am
Nichols claimed that as a Christian, he must adhere to a high fiber diet of whole foods.In Mauwee v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:19 am
Film Ventures Int'l and Nichols v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:36 am
This could be a recipe for confusion” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [22], Lord Nicholls). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Nicholls 1999 CanLII 2750 (ON CA), (1999), 139 C.C.C. (3d) 253 (Ont. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
“Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Godard v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
Thanks to Charles Nichols for the pointer. .. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Bhasin v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am
The Court of Appeal distinguished the principles in Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605 and in re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 and instead followed Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am
This should not be taken as an attack on the approach the English courts have taken in the recent reported cases. [read post]
