Search for: "Nichols v. Miller" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am by Roger Parloff
Defendant Miller, of Dallas County, Texas, still faces 11 other charges, including five felonies, so it’s unclear whether the department will appeal Nichols’s ruling. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:59 am by Jon Sands
Ant, 882 F.2d 1389 (9th Cir. 1989), and that no subsequent decision of the Supreme Court had undermined that decision enough to deem it implicitly overruled under Miller v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
" He then went on to quote Lord Nicholls in Miller and McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618: "where it becomes necessary to distinguish matrimonial property from non-matrimonial property the court may do so with the degree of particularity or generality appropriate in the case. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
Communes in the Counter Culture (William Morrow and Co., 1972).Miller, Timothy. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
However, the class also includes the matter of the retroactive application of the Miller v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280, the case asking whether Miller v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:47 pm by Rishabh Bhandari
” But Mark Miller, the head prosecutor, flags that a decision might need to be made between an in camera or ex parte discussion over AE92. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Scholastic Inc. v Harris, 259 F3d 73, 85-86 [2d Cir 2001]; Johnson v Kennedy, 350 Mass 294, 298, 214 NE2d 276, 278 [1966]; Posner v Miller, 356 Mich 6, 9, 96 NW2d 110, 111-112 [1959]; Nicholes v Hunt, 273 Or 255, 261-262, 541 P2d 820, 823-824 [1975]; Willman v Beheler, 499 SW2d 770, 775 [Mo 1973]; Fisher v Fisher, 83 Cal App 2d 357, 360, 188 P2d 802, 804 [1948]). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm by Matt Gluck
  Adam Chan described the Supreme Court’s ruling in Torres v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
This ruling represented arguably the most important family law case decided by the Supreme Court and the most significant judgment dealing with ancillary relief matters since Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. [read post]