Search for: "Nicole Saharsky"
Results 41 - 58
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2011, 9:10 am
Nicole A. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
Saharsky, assistant to the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am
Argument on Behalf of the United States as Amicus Curiae Nicole A. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:03 am
Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:08 pm
Nicole Saharsky, arguing amicus for the Government, said that the Fifth Circuit erred in requiring proof of loss causation at class certification for three reasons: First, it's conducting a merits inquiry that's not tethered to the Rule 23 requirements; second, it's taking a presumption and requiring plaintiffs to prove it; and third, it's confusing the distinct elements of reliance and loss causation. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm
Arguing for the government, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky told the Court that “[w]hether you call it freebase, coca paste or crack, it’s the same thing chemically. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm
Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky argued on behalf of the respondent, Attorney General Eric Holder. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
"Congress has taken a hard line over the past 20 years on criminal aliens, particularly recidivist criminal aliens," said Nicole Saharsky, an assistant to the solicitor general. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
Arguing on behalf of the United States as an amicus supporting Michigan, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky emphasized that Miranda requires only that a suspect’s decision to talk to police be “knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 8:27 am
Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky, arguing on behalf of the United States in support of Kucana, reiterated that Congress’s enumeration of those executive decisions not subject to judicial review â€" coupled with its silence with regard to motions to reopen â€" clearly demonstrated its intent to maintain courts’ jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
Next, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky argued briefly as an amicus curiae supporting the respondents on behalf of the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Nicole A. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Representing the United States as amicus curiae, Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole A. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:52 am
(She's Nicole A. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
One bright spot in the colloquy came during Assistant to the Solicitor General Nicole Saharsky's defense of an expansive view of the law. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
" Nicole Saharsky of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the petitioner, and Troy Giatris of Charleston, W. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:33 pm
The unanimous affirmance was not unexpected in light of that fact that Nicole Saharsky, the Assistant to the Solicitor General who argued the case on behalf of the federal government, faced so few questions from the Justices that she used only seven of her allotted thirty minutes at oral argument. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:13 pm
There are some well-known and some less-publicized highlights, including Heller, the Second Amendment case; Munaf/Omar, dealing with the very important question of the habeas rights of U.S. citizens detained in Iraq; Attorney General Mukasey’s first argument, 30 minutes for the petitioner in Ressam (on Tuesday, March 25th); and the first oral arguments before the Court for three new Assistants to the SG (Anthony Yang, Nicole Saharsky, and William Jay). [read post]
