Search for: "Niles v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
Blue Nile had filed a Motion to Dismiss HOF's complaint in part based on the argument that its purchase of the keyword "Hearts On Fire" was not trademark use.After reviewing the conflicting circuit court decisions on the matter (the First Circuit Court of Appeals has yet to address this issue), United States District Judge Nancy Gertner, in denying Blue Nile's Motion to Dismiss, decided to follow the Ninth and Tenth Circuit precedents on the… [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:06 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Ardavan Arzandeh, “Brownlie II and The Service-Out Jurisdiction under English Law” FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (Brownlie II) is arguably the United Kingdom’s highest appellate court’s most significant decision this century on a private international law question. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 6:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
That was the issue in the March 2018, opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:53 pm by mdkeenan
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court changed the law regarding police stops. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 12:46 pm by Brandy Robinson, EDMI
        Confronted with these facts, the Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by Mukarrum Ahmed
  In FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Lady Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45 (“Brownlie II”), the Supreme Court held as a matter of ratio by a 4:1 majority that consequential loss satisfies the ‘tort gateway’ in Practice Direction (“PD”) 6B, para. 3.1(9)(a). [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 11:31 pm
’s position on the global stage than other candidates. [46] V. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 5:52 am
A report published by the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) earlier this month has further highlighted the dearth of comparable, decision-useful ESG disclosures sought by investors. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
Compare Appellant's Brief at 2-29 with United States v. [read post]