Search for: "Ninth Street Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2022, 9:28 am by Amy Heath and Kathryn Cahoy
Last week, in a decision that confirms the viability of cy pres settlements in privacy class action cases, the Ninth Circuit affirmed approval of a class action injunctive relief and cy pres-only settlement in In re Google Inc. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
The Ninth Circuit’s full opinion in The Facebook Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:43 pm by Steve Brachmann
This morning, Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a decision for a unanimous Supreme Court in Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 6:23 am by Barry Barnett
The Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit erred when he booted patent infringement claims against "Street View", the Google feature that lets you view houses, buildings, and other objects that line streets and highways online. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 11:20 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted a new hearing this past Friday in Joffe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 8:51 am
In Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 05-56794, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court's broad injunction preventing Perfumebay from using the conjoined form of the word because such use created a likelihood of confusion with eBay. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 4:51 pm
In Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 05-56794, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the District Court's broad injunction preventing Perfumebay from using the conjoined form of the word because such use created a likelihood of confusion with eBay. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:42 pm by David Klein
“The Wolf of Wall Street,” and his company, Global Motivation, Inc (“GMI”), had sent marketing communications in violation of both the TCPA and the FTSA. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:11 pm
How often does the Ninth Circuit refer to the attire of Britney Spears as a factual predicate for the resolution of an appeal? [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
The Ninth Circuit held that the federal court did not have jurisdiction to hear the action because defendants had held an advisory vote in compliance with the federal Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”), 15 U.S.C. [read post]