Search for: "Nixon v. Administrator of General Services"
Results 81 - 100
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
And there was Nixon’s release of Lt. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 6:16 am
The Supreme Court has often affirmed, many times since United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 12:44 pm
While it is not unusual for an Attorney General to leave service during a President’s term, it is rare for one to leave at the President’s request. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Those two cases were decided, it so happens, immediately after President Nixon repopulated the Court in the early 1970s.[11] That in itself is telling. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm
The low-profile case with a tax angle that I mentioned at the beginning of this column is Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
In its brief to the Supreme Court in American Foreign Service Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
He has, for example, expressed sympathy and support for Robert Bork, the Justice Department official (and later, Supreme Court nominee) who fired Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox as directed by President Nixon after the attorney general and deputy attorney general both refused to do so. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
“Rushing weak candidates through is a good way to put points on the board, but only weakens their own administration in the long run. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
The Trump Administration has distinguished itself throughout its brief duration as an unusually unruly and venomous collection of scorpions in a jar even by Washington standards. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977), the Court held that Congress could nationalize the documents, but that it was a 5th Amendment taking, requiring compensation. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:05 am
At that time, the General Services Administration performed that function. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
In considering enforcement of the subpoena in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
” In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:47 pm
The Supreme Court has stated in Department of the Navy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:19 am
Augustine, Selma, and Memphis; and records from the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations, detailing the interaction between civil rights leaders and organizations and the highest levels of the federal government. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
As it happens, my father was then a partner in a small Whittier law firm that Nixon had been a partner in some two to three decades earlier, before he was elected to Congress. [read post]
