Search for: "Nixon v. Administrator of General Services"
Results 161 - 170
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
(This is the second in a series of posts; the first post, published yesterday, is here.)Helpfully generating an on-line discussion of my new book, War·Time: An Idea, Its History, Its Consequences, University of Chicago Law Professor Eric Posner dismissed an argument about Cold War statebuilding, writing that "it would be hard to exaggerate legal scholars’ obsession with the rise of executive power, going back at least to the Nixon administration, indeed… [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
As it happens, my father was then a partner in a small Whittier law firm that Nixon had been a partner in some two to three decades earlier, before he was elected to Congress. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
The question before Judge Carter is whether it is more likely than not that Eastman’s legal services were being used in furtherance of a crime. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:39 am
Smartly, Eisenhower maintained the New Deal policies and supported civil rights, including the 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:19 am
Augustine, Selma, and Memphis; and records from the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations, detailing the interaction between civil rights leaders and organizations and the highest levels of the federal government. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Some say they are doing it out of a desire to be in public service or because they have a longtime loyalty to their congressional bosses. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Before I do that, however, I should perhaps begin by explaining how it was that although I was hired by the University of Miami on the assumption, which I shared, that I would write about Administrative law and Constitutional Law, I instead turned into a law cyber-geek. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
