Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 1,228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm
Nixon appointed Justice Stevens to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:20 am
In recent years, the Utah Supreme Court has produced many unusually interesting, thoughtful, and academic (in the best sense) opinions; here's another from last Thursday, Nixon v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 1:05 pm
Judge Tatel interrupts to point out that Burger’s concurrence was Burger’s view, but the majority view set forth in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 7:22 pm
The case is Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
She stated, at paras. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Mary Ziegler, Florida State University College of Law and former LHB Guest Blogger is up on the BBC History Extra with A brief history of US abortion law, before and after Roe v Wade. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:11 pm
See State of California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am
At the Nixon Foundation blog, Jeffrey Morris notes that next week marks the 50th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s appointment of Chief Justice Warren Burger, and he assesses Burger’s legacy. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
Republicans like to blame the Warren Court for everything they don’t like but it was the Burger Court, with four Nixon appointees, that decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
Red terror pushed the legitimised violence of the new state to the extremes. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Near v. [read post]
