Search for: "Nixon v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:28 am
Madison (1803), the Constitution makes the United States "a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration relating to the… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
The clause says the president “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 12:38 pm
In Burdick v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:35 am
” The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this morning in Nestlé USA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 6:58 am
Tracy Nixon v. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Many of these are drawn from research for the book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States as well as work done for the American Law Institute’s Principles of Law—Election Administration project. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Likewise, the only one of President Nixon's appointees to recuse in United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Likewise, the only one of President Nixon's appointees to recuse in United v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
In parts of the United States, back alley abortions would then have remained common, and lunch counters segregated.But to Republicans today, defeating Bork was the original sin. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Bush v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Despite the asymmetry between the two books, two concerns unite them that deserve critical treatment. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
(nominado por Richard Nixon). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:38 am
United States, 236 U.S. 79, a 1915 U.S. [read post]
