Search for: "Nken v. Holder" Results 41 - 60 of 83
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 9:46 am by Steve Vladeck
 Holder (pp. 8-12 of the linked slip opinion), which explains the myriad-if-subtle differences between injunctions and stays, even if their standards overlap. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:56 am by Leland E. Beck
 As pointed out at SCOTUSblog, the Solicitor General informed the Court in April that the partial victory in Nken v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:59 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) Lyle Denniston has an interesting post on SCOTUSBlog discussing whether the Court will reconsider its judgment in Nken v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: Lyle Denniston of this blog discusses the recent request by immigrants’ rights group that the Court modify its 2009 opinion in Nken v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Lyle Denniston
That is what the Court now confronts in the case of Nken v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, the Department of Justice admitted yesterday that it inadvertently erred when, during the 2009 arguments in Nken v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:51 pm by Lyle Denniston
The problem with the information, supplied in the 2009 case of Nken v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:28 am by immigrationprof
Kowalski on LexisNexis Immigration Law Community reports that, after being raked over the coals for misleading the Supreme Court in Nken v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Holder, a 2009 immigration case. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:45 am by Jess Bravin
Chief Justice John Roberts cited that assurance in his opinion for the court, Nken v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Holder, a 2009 immigration case. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:11 pm by immigrationprof
From Washington Square Legal Services: Scrambling to Cover Up a Possible Lie to the Supreme Court in Nken v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:11 pm by immigrationprof
From Washington Square Legal Services: Scrambling to Cover Up a Possible Lie to the Supreme Court in Nken v. [read post]