Search for: "No Named Respondents"
Results 81 - 100
of 30,451
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2012, 10:03 am
Respondent’s use of the domain name is a critical factor, but so too is the trademark. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 12:20 pm
In a brief dated yesterday, New York's Attorney General responded to the lawsuit brought by Public Citizen and an upstate law firm to challenge the new adverting rules for attorneys (see: Skadden Website and Others Named In Ethics Lawsuit). [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 1:38 pm
Responding to pressure from federal bank regulators, Citigroup on Wednesday named Richard D. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
The court responds that E-SIGN doesn’t have a private right of action, nor does Arizona’s implementation of UETA. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:05 am
FIRST THINGS FIRST — DO NOT RESPOND. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:45 am
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 3:58 am
As I am the product of an American law school, it’s hard to resist the gravitational pull of responding with “it depends,” but in this instance I have little difficulty. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm
WAI argued that to prevent complainants from manipulating the system by naming only respondents likely to default or mount a weak defense, it is the ITC’s policy to encourage complainants seeking a general exclusion order to name all known alleged infringers in their complaint. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:15 pm
In response, the Respondent claimed that the Complaint failed to mention that the parties had a substantial business relationship dating from 2005, when Respondent financed Complainant's purchase of the disputed domain name, which Complainant was supposed to register in both his and Respondent's name and to develop into a "search engine" website. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:15 pm
In response, the Respondent claimed that the Complaint failed to mention that the parties had a substantial business relationship dating from 2005, when Respondent financed Complainant's purchase of the disputed domain name, which Complainant was supposed to register in both his and Respondent's name and to develop into a "search engine" website. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:45 am
Keating Law Offices, P.C. has named the City of Chicago as a Respondent in Discovery in a lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County – Law Division on behalf of Chicago bicyclist, Dustin Valenta. [read post]
7 May 2013, 6:30 am
The Respondents denied this, alleging that another entity with the same name, incorporated in Hong Kong, had in fact chartered the vessel. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 3:18 pm
We posted previously at LawPundit about the fact that the trademarked lawpundit name has been stolen at Twitter and that the management there is not responding to our complaints to have that name turned over to us - and this is part of established Twitter policy.Blogger Erik J. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:19 pm
Schemes go by the teasing names of CryptoLocker and WannaCry, but there’s nothing playful about finding that you are a target. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 5:16 am
Most details, including the names of those involved and the condition of the injured have been withheld at this time. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:57 am
In this classic case of cybersquatting, Respondent registered the domain name "jackandjones.com", which linked to websites offering fashion goods of third parties and other content. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:15 am
At the request of the Provider upon receiving a complaint the Registrar is required to confirm the following basic information: “the domain name is registered with it; the Respondent is listed as the registrant of the domain name; the current contact details for the respondent are as given in the Complaint; and [English or another language] is the language of the registration agreement. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 11:32 am
On December 5, 1999, Respondent registered the domain name "celiacruz.com". [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 3:59 pm
On one hand, the substantive defense of BLM as a name and a movement is spot-on, especially the idea of focus v. exclusion. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:05 am
Constitution failed to ignite the Panel or to catch hold generally and in close to a 100 cases against the same Respondent the domain names were transferred. [read post]
