Search for: "Noble v. Alis"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Ali, 2015 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:35 pm
LEXIS 13173 (SD IL, Jan. 31, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with certain of his claims regarding denial of a halal diet when the lacto-ovo diet created health problems for him.In Ali v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
LEXIS 168323 (ND CA, Sept. 28, 2018), a California federal district court dismissed, in part on qualified immunity grounds, a complaint by a Moorish Science Temple of America adherent that he is not allowed to carry a picture of the Holy Prophet Noble Drew Ali outside of his cell.In Sterling v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
Stanley v. [read post]
Chief Justice John Roberts and the “Privilege” of Seeing the World from Behind Fences and Barricades
25 May 2023, 9:01 pm
” Noble ambition, but again far removed from the lives of people who toil to make a living or to please bosses who give them instructions and have power over them.Roberts’s speech before the ALI suggests just how comfortable he is with judging in a way that keeps the world at bay and exemplifies the confidence of someone whose life took him to Harvard and beyond.Listening to the ALI speech, I was reminded of what the Chief Justice told his son’s… [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
Noble, 2007 WL 2789561, at *9 (E.D. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
Mr Noble [for Ms J] submits to me that is the wrong claim. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 3:48 pm
Mr Noble [for Ms J] submits to me that is the wrong claim. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
* Obviousness, common general knowledge and expectations of success: Leo gets a mauling Jeremy hosts this post by Suleman Ali (Holly IP) on Teva UK Limited & Teva Pharmaceuticals Limited v Leo Pharma A/S & Leo Laboratories Limited [2014] EWHC 3096 (Pat), a decision by Mr Justice Birss in the Patents Court, England and Wales which addresses two patent law cornerstones: obviousness and common general knowledge. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO… [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
My post on Wednesday morning has attracted a large number of comments, including many thoughtful contributions, and so I would like to follow up concerning the wider issue of product-by-process claims (independent of the specific Hospira v Genentech case), gathering up, and responding to, some of the comments.In the meantime, readers interested in the decision itself may care to visit the report by Katfriend Suleman Ali (Holly IP) posted on the PatLit blog here, which has a more… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm
But the time it takes for a case to reach this stage varies substantially from 3 months (Ali v Associated Newspapers 2010 EWHC 100 (QB)) to 28 months (Kaschke v Gray 2010 EWHC 1907 (QB)) and it may well be that in many of the judgments in favour of the claimant, quantum remains in issue. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, PropertyShark.com is sponsoring a Manhattan real-estate networking event at The Madison & Gypsy Tea (27 West 24th Street). [read post]
