Search for: "Noe v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Court Says Trustee Cannot Buy or Sell Real Estate after Trust Termination
2 May 2024, 9:35 am by Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation at Iowa State University
The court relied on In re Estate of Jurgens, 31 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1948) and Noe v. [read post]
ISU CALT Articles - https://www.calt.iastate.edu/articles-blogposts
Reversal of Misfortune: Second District Holds CEQA Action Challenging Los Angeles Housing Development Project Barred By Statute of Limitations, Reverses Trial Court Judgment Rejecting MND and Requiring EIR
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Delia Guerrero et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Eugene Volokh] Alleging Police Officer's "OK" Symbol Was "White Power" Hand Sign Is Constitutionally Protected Opinion
27 Dec 2023, 12:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Vail v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Second District Reverses Preliminary Injunction, Holds CEQA Cannot Trump Santa Barbara County’s Authority To Remove Unpermitted Encroachments Placed In Public Right-Of-Way By Adjacent Landowners
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Christopher Anderson, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Permanent Vacation” In Palm Springs? – Fourth District Holds CEQA’s Short 35-Day Statute of Limitations Does Not Apply Despite City’s Filing of NOE Due To Subsequent Material Change In Street Vacation Project Which Triggered Maximum 180-Day Limitations Period
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Committee to Relocate Marilyn v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
[Eugene Volokh] Police Officer's Defamation Suit Over Claims That Circled-Finger Sign Was "White Supremacist" Dismissed
6 Mar 2023, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
There's finally a substantive decision in Olthaus v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Second District Holds Brown Act Requires Lead Agency To List CEQA Exemption As Item of Business On Agenda For Public Meeting When Project Already Found Exempt By Staff Is Considered For Approval
31 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Industries v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A Teaching Moment? First District Affirms CEQA Action Demurrer Order Finding Late-Joined Developers of UC Berkeley Campus Project Were Necessary, But Not Indispensable, Real Parties In Interest
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (Citing Tinsley v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  McCann v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Addresses CEQA Statute of Limitations And Tolling Agreement Rules In Affirming Judgment Upholding EBRPD’s Approval of Tree Removal MOU With PG&E
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save Lafayette Trees, et. al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Oregon Court Affirms Klamath Tribes’ Water Rights
28 Feb 2021, 8:00 am by Matthew Campbell
Represented by NARF, the Klamath Tribes successfully achieved recognition of their treaty-reserved water rights in federal court litigation in the 1970s and 1980s in United States v. [read post]
Turtle Talk - http://turtletalk.wordpress.com/
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The case is Golden Door Properties, LLC v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017, and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2020 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017, and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2020 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017 and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
"For meg er det et mysterium at regjeringen skal legge seg opp i dette på denne måten" [For me, it is a mystery that the government should get involved in this in this way], Unraveling the "Mystery" of the Norwegian Government's Block of Rules Limiting Lawyer Advice that Entails Human Rights Violations
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
  At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
Law at the End of the Day - http://lcbackerblog.blogspot.com/
2020 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, Daniel S. Cucchi, William W. Abbott, Glen C. Hansen and Diane G. Kindermann
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017 and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Second District Reaffirms Rule That Filing of Facially Valid NOD Triggers Short CEQA Statute of Limitations And Plaintiff May Not “Go Behind” Agency’s Declarations In Document To Challenge Validity of Project Approval
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing County of Amador v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020 CEQA 1st QUARTER REVIEW
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am by William W. Abbott, Glen C. Hansen, Diane G. Kindermann and Daniel S. Cucchi
County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Once More Into the “Brambled Thicket”: Fourth District Reverses Ruling Sustaining Demurrer to Action Challenging Caltrans’ Claim of Statutory CEQA Exemption For Freeway Interchange Project, Holds Streets and Highways Code § 103’s Coastal Commission Exemption Does Not Apply And That Petition Adequately Pleaded Estoppel Against Caltrans to Assert 35-Day Statute of Limitations Based on NOE Filing
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Citizens for a Responsible Caltrans Decision v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com