Search for: "Noe v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 84
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
See Town Versus Gown Fight Continues Over State University EIR. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:18 am
Copyright © 2009, All rights reserved [lawprofessors.typepad.com]Cole v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Albert Thomas Paulek v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
He was joined by Arthur Sutherland, who represented the losing party in Nebbia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm
Citizens For Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:29 pm
” (Tomlinson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
In Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 9:57 am
In Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
The filing of a facially-valid Notice of Exemption (NOE) triggers a 35-day statute of limitations (Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
By Kate Hart In a decision filed on February 11, 2009, Committee for Green Foothills v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
(Citing Concerned Dublin Citizens v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
Noe, each articulating a side of this debate. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
City of Visalia (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 408 [don’t prematurely file your NOE or NOD if you want it to effectively trigger the shortest limitations period]; San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:32 pm
Industries v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am
Save Lafayette Trees, et. al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Petitioners first became aware of the NOE on September 28, 2017 and requested Caltrans rescind the NOE or agree to a 180-day statute of limitations for challenging the decision. [read post]
