Search for: "Non Insurer Defendants"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2012, 5:38 pm
First, this decision has to some extent clarified the law with respect to whether a duty to defend can arise from an indemnity or insurance clause in a non-insurance contract, such as a building contract. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 8:40 am
Pillsbury & Coleman partner Ryan Opgenorth and his team successfully compelled insurance carrier Great American to defend its non-profit insured Norcal Services for the Deaf & Hard of Hearing in an action pending in Sacramento County Superior Court. [read post]
13 May 2014, 4:45 am
FCGPI was insured by a State Farm business liability policy, and State Farm brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration of non-coverage based primarily on various policy exceptions. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
PERSONAL AUTO – NON-OWNED CAR – HOUSEHOLD RESIDENT RELATIVE – TIMELY DISCLAIMER – INSURANCE LAW § 3420(D)(2) Konstantinou v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
The defendant insurer closed its case without leading any evidence. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
The insurer’s defense obligation requires it to provide the insured with a defense against a claim seeking damages potentially payable under the policy, not to defend the insured’s honor or otherwise assist it in resolving a non-monetary dispute which a claim for pure injunctive relief was. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
The insurer’s defense obligation requires it to provide the insured with a defense against a claim seeking damages potentially payable under the policy, not to defend the insured’s honor or otherwise assist it in resolving a non-monetary dispute which a claim for pure injunctive relief was. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:04 pm
August 27, 2008 The defendant, the insured, sought a declaration that a third party insurer was obligated to defend him in the main action pursuant to a rental policy of insurance issued by the insurer to the insured. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
The court noted the general rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify, such that the insurer must defend even non-covered claims if other claims may be covered by the policy. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:13 am
The distributor’s insurance company then sought a judgment that it was not required to defend the distributor. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:47 am
A Massachusetts trial court recently ruled on a number of issues concerning an insurer’s duties where it agrees to defend an insured under a reservation of rights, including: (1) an insurer’s duty to defend an affiliated company that owns all of the insured’s shares when only the affiliated company and not the insured is named as a defendant in the lawsuit; (2) an… [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:01 pm
”) The Speed Court held: “What the insurer believes about the duty to defend or policy coverage is immaterial to the court’s duty to defend determination. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
The attorney for the defendant and State Farm argued that the judge erred in commanding discovery from non-parties that had not been subpoenaed. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:53 am
The Illinois Appellate Court has affirmed in part and reversed in part a case dealing with an insurer’s duty to defend an insured. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:13 pm
Defense bills incurred before the insurer agreed to defend are submitted for reimbursement. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:21 am
The court noted the general rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is broader than its duty to indemnify, such that the insurer must defend even non-covered claims if other claims may be covered by the policy. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm
In a lawsuit involving both insured and non-insured plaintiffs, the court ruled, the insurance carrier must “provide indemnity for losses on claims by non-insured plaintiffs but not for losses on claims by insured plaintiffs. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 6:45 am
The defendants argued that they were not on risk as a result of a material non-disclosure; or, in the alternative, they were not liable as a result of several breaches of warranty by the insureds. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:17 am
The Virginia Supreme Court reaffirmed that Steadfast Insurance Co. owed no duty to defend AES Corp. under a CGL policy against claims of intentional release of greenhouse gases. [read post]
27 Jul 2021, 8:02 am
The defendant insurers treated the insurance as commoditised and streamlined as a cost-saving exercise. [read post]
