Search for: "Non Insurer Defendants"
Results 61 - 80
of 7,059
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2009, 2:59 am
Not only are there two potentially conflicting sets of individuals yoked together in the traditional D&O insurance policy, but since the mid-90s, the traditional D&O insurance policy has also incorporated so-called “entity coverage” for securities claims, providing the company with balance sheet protection and representing yet another potential conflict within the policy with respect to the interests of the… [read post]
27 May 2015, 7:00 am
In Ironshore, the court ended up staying parts of the insurer’s declaratory actions and not staying other parts, depending on which arguments for non-coverage were asserted by the insurer. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
Welch tendered its demand for indemnification and defense to all three of its insurers, two of whom refused to defend. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 1:50 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that an “insured v. insured” clause exclusion in a D&O policy for claims asserted by an insured against an insured did not preclude the insurer from paying for the entire defense costs incurred by insured and non-insured claimants. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:45 am
An insurance brokerage firm sued a group of employees, claiming that they violated their non-solicitation agreements by luring away employees and clients to launch a new office for a competitor. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
The Rationale Although the insured named the non-diverse claims manager and adjuster in its complaint, the insurer removed the case to District Court and argued these two defendants were “fraudulently joined” solely to defeat diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:49 am
The insurer argued that it should not be required to defend or indemnify against the damages arising out of the claims. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 10:57 am
For non-insurance practitioners, this is often a confounding and confusing topic! [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 10:10 am
Insurer Duty-to-Defend Standard State Law Survey See this analysis from coverage expert Randy Maniloff exploring laws across the 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia on the determination of an insurer's duty to defend under either a four-corners or extrinsic-evidence rule. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 6:39 am
The defendant, State Farm Insurance, requested all of our client’s contracts, arrangements and agreements with HMO’s, PPO’s, Medicare, Medicaid and Workers Compensation. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:35 pm
Third, the Court must determine whether any of the properly pleaded non-derivative claims may be covered by the insurance policy. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm
In the Tosco case, the insurer denied coverage for the covered claims it was defending because the insured had settled the non-covered claims that the insurer was defending under a reservation of rights. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:39 pm
In the Tosco case, the insurer denied coverage for the covered claims it was defending because the insured had settled the non-covered claims that the insurer was defending under a reservation of rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:49 am
LEXIS 95, (Feb. 15, 2011), the defendant’s Insurer, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company was mentioned by name four times. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:35 am
In Parker and Parker v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd [2012] EWHC 2156 (Comm), the High Court held that the Defendant insurers, National Farmers Union (NFU), could not avoid the claim of the First Claimant, Mrs. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:49 am
The vehicle the plaintiffs were driving was not insured in their names, but under a separate non-stacking commercial policy issued by the defendant insurance company. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 4:25 pm
This article does not address EU (European) or Japan based non-U.S. insurers. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:48 am
The draft is on SSRN, and the abstract is here:We analyze the extent to which private defensive litigation insurance deters patent assertion by non-practicing entities (NPEs). [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
Non-Duplication: This SUM coverage shall not duplicate any of the following: (a) benefits payable under workers' compensation or other similar laws; (b) non-occupational disability benefits under article nine of the Workers' Compensation Law or other similar law; (c) any amounts recovered or recoverable pursuant to article fifty-one of the New York Insurance Law or any similar motor vehicle insurance payable without regard to fault;(d) any… [read post]
5 May 2019, 6:00 am
XL Specialty Insurance Company, et al., C.A. [read post]
