Search for: "Nook v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2012, 12:01 pm
However, if a mark was registered or applied for before the dates of accession of new Member States, then the relevant territory, and therefore relevant public, is made up only of the States that composed the EU at the relevant time (Art. 165(4)(a)). [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 7:04 am by David J. Clark
A July 27, 2010 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
In another we praised the court for being "in sync" with sound preemption principals.The latest opinion, Timberlake v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:51 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
Within this nook of constitutional law, the courts have followed certain rules and principles with remarkable consistency. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 10:20 am by Beth Graham
  In his scholarly article, Professor Szalai examines the United States Supreme Court’s recent Federal Arbitration Act jurisprudence with a particular focus on the high court’s 2015 decision in Directv, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm by Jon Markman
Case in point: e-readers like the Kindle and the Nook. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:11 am
("Hostess"), one of Bimbo’s competitors, based on misappropriation of trade secrets involving Thomas’ English Muffins’ "nooks and crannies. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:09 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
sMounting bills Project 365(2) Day 142 (Photo credit: Keith Williamson) V is for Voluntary Disclosure. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]