Search for: "Nordstrom v. Wells"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Nordstrom Inc., were recently filed by the same plaintiffs’ firm that filed Ramos v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am
Since 2014, they have sold a total of 7 units of apparel (5 of which were bought by the CEO’s friends). lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:26 am
Several pre-selected opinions (Loving v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am
See Nordstrom, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:22 pm
Courts and in the 1990s and early 2000s various leading cases such as Nordstrom and Caterpillar produced doctrines such as the larger settlement rule. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:48 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:50 pm
Mulder v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:37 pm
Nordstrom, Inc. on Monday. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:37 pm
Nordstrom, Inc. on Monday. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:14 am
Moroccanoil, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
[Mendoza v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:28 am
Kische USA LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
” Well, we tried. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Hackett, Sixth Circuit: Appellant was convicted by a jury of various gang-related, weapons, and drug offenses as well as a RICO conspiracy charge and was sentenced to 440 months' imprisonment. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:59 am
Prison officials are 'responsible for maintaining internal order and discipline,' as well as 'securing their institutions against unauthorized access or escape.' Martinez, 416 U.S. at 404. [read post]
