Search for: "North Carolina State Bar v. Nelson" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2019, 11:22 am by Benjamin Beaton
Earlier this term, the Supreme Court heard argument in related gerrymandering cases from North Carolina and Maryland. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
App. 1991), the court barred pharmacist claims.KentuckyHyman & Armstrong, P.S.C. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Early on, however, the American bench and Bar seemed to reach an uneasy stalemate about the contours of the debate regarding corporate social responsibility. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
App. 1986).IndianaDefense informal interviews with treating physicians are barred in the Hoosier State as well. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Thornburg of Asheville, N.C., who had declared the plants a “public nuisance” because of their effect on air quality in North Carolina’s scenic western mountains. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:00 am by Guest Blogger
As I have argued elsewhere, [3] IP laws are deliberate government interventions in the market to try to shape how people participate in that market, encouraging new creation by rewarding it with above-market returns and discouraging imitation by imposing damages or even barring it altogether.Once we understand IP laws as government social policies that seek to alter market outcomes, we can start to think of those laws as part of a broader tapestry of government rules that affect… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Charlotte Observer, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Co. has agreed to pay a $4 million penalty for a 2005 chlorine and diesel fuel spill that killed nine people and polluted a creek in western South Carolina, the federal government said Monday. [read post]