Search for: "North Carolina v. Rice" Results 21 - 40 of 95
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 11:21 am by Phil Dixon
North Carolina offense of assault by strangulation qualifies as a felony crime of violence U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:27 am by Erin Scharff
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:00 am by Paul Caron
Supreme Court granted certiorari in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 8:28 am by Erin Scharff
The case arose when North Carolina attempted to tax the income earned by the Kimberley Rice Kaestner 1992 Family Trust from 2005 to 2008. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
Tomorrow the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the case of North Carolina Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:33 pm
Fortunately, Seattle University law student Michael Rice — who publishes the software-oriented Coderights law blog in his spare time — put me onto a new dispute out of the Eastern District of North Carolina. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:10 am by John McFarland
Landowners in Texas challenged the right of pipelines to condemn easements for intrastate lines in Texas in Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:23 am by Joel R. Brandes
His expenses included the costs Petitioner incurred flying to North Carolina and back to the Republic of Ireland along with the costs of his lodging in North Carolina ($2,648.63), the costs Petitioner incurred flying E.L.W.J. from North Carolina to the Republic of Ireland ($844.30), and the cost of Petitioner's rental car in North Carolina ($481.93). [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Newton and North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 5:57 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
One of the children moved to North Carolina, and North Carolina sought to tax all the income of a subtrust because that child was a North Carolina resident. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
In the opinion that was released in June, the Court stated that minimum connections to the state of North Carolina were needed before the state could tax trust and that the residence of the beneficiary being in North Carolina was not enough. [read post]