Search for: "North Dakota v. Thomas" Results 101 - 120 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
  Here are some panels that may be of interest to readers:YOUNGBLOOD: YOUTH, RACE, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS PRESIDING: Prudence Cumberbatch, Brooklyn College The Racial and Sexual Politics of Space: Youth and Interracial Mixing in New Orleans, Lakisha Michelle Simmons, Davidson College  More than a Hamburger and a Cup of Coffee: NAACP Youth and the Black Freedom Movement, Thomas Bynum, Middle Tennessee State University  Blackboard Jungle: Desegregation,… [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:15 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (which hears all appeals in federal cases filed in the states between North Dakota, Minnesota, Arkansas, and Nebraska), reversed a preliminary injunction imposed by the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:52 am by Lyle Denniston
  (The river compact at issue, dating to 1951, also includes the state of North Dakota, but it was not involved in this latest twist in the case.) [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 11:58 am by LindaMBeale
The best answer, then, would be for the Supreme Court to revisit its conclusion in the 1992 case Quill Corporation v North Dakota, which required a physical presence in order for states to mandate collection of their sales taxes by companies that make sales to their residents. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:17 pm by Katie Smith, ACLU
After 2008's 8th Circuit Court decision in Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. [read post]
North Dakota Century Code section 17-04-06: the first step toward a level playing field for wind projects and rural landowners. 85 N.D. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
Over a decade later, the North Dakota Supreme Court and Wisconsin Supreme Court recognized good faith exceptions for changing law in light of Richards v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Gordon (North Dakota), Sital Kalantry (Cornell), Lillian Aponte Miranda (Florida International), David Pimentel (Florida Coastal). ? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
It has been introduced in legislatures all over the nation, and has passed in both chambers in Oklahoma and one in South Dakota. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
Thus, however obviously sensible it would be to join North Dakota and South Dakota together in "Dakota," that can't be done without the consent of each of the states (as well as Congress), and, of course, one cannot imagine circumstances where the Dakotas would decide that having two senators is better than the present four;2) the right, guaranteed in Article V, to each state to veto any change in the (indefensable) allocation of… [read post]