Search for: "North Dakota v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 617
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am by Kevin Kaufman
Such a statute could read: No state or locality may rely upon the new constitutional standard for substantial nexus articulated by the United States Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by Kevin Kaufman
”[3] In South Carolina, “unprepared food that lawfully may be purchased with United States Department of Agriculture food coupons” is exempt from the state’s sales and use tax.[4] Meanwhile, other states categorize sales tax status based primarily on who the vendor is or where the food is consumed. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” With an op-ed at Forbes, Greg Maloney calls the decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm by Ilya Shapiro
North Dakota is out of step with modern commerce clause precedents. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:24 pm by Matthew Landis
North Dakota, which required collection and remittance of state sales tax when a retailer has a physical presence in the state. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
North Dakota and its physical-nexus rule for the states being able to require out-of-state retailers to collect sales tax. [read post]